Week in Review – September 11, 2016

Sometimes you just get blindsided and even hindsight is inadequate in explaining what just happened.

There’s very little reason to ever get hit in the face, as human instinct is to protect that vulnerable piece of anatomy.

Yet, sometimes there’s a complete absence of anticipation or lack of preparation for fast, unfolding events.

Sometimes you just get lulled into a sense of security and take your eye off events surrounding you.

Granted, sometimes your inattention helps you to avoid doing the logical thing and missing out on something wonderful, but more often than not, there is a price to be paid for inattention.

When I first started writing a blog. there was a 417 point decline in the DJIA on the third day of that blog.

That was in 2007 when 417 points actually stood for something.

This past Friday’s nearly 400 point decline was minimal, by comparison.

Back in 2007, the culprit for the decline was a nearly 9% drop in the Chinese stock market. It was easy to connect the dots and honestly, you had to see some collapse coming in that market, at that time, as most everyone was beginning to openly question the veracity, validity and credibility of economic and corporate reports coming from China.

I suppose that there was some kind of identifiable culprit this past Friday, as well, but after a very quiet and protracted period following the recovery from the “Brexit” sell-off, there was little reason to suspect that it would happen on Friday.

Sure, there were the fears of an interest rate increase being now more likely to come in just 2 weeks, but there has already been plenty of indication that investors have already accepted an increase is likely in December. Why would those few months make such a big difference in confidence?

The answers are pre-programmed.

“The market doesn’t like uncertainty,” or “investors took the opportunity for some profit taking.”

Of course, there will always be someone who can squint enough and stare at chart formations long enough to see the “obvious” warning signs in hindsight, but there was really very little reason to have seen the sell-off coming.

The march higher by the market after “Brexit” fears disappeared was orderly and we’ve gone though a nice period of stability.

Boring, perhaps, but when is stability exciting?

Perhaps it’s when you’re defenses are down and you get lulled into a state of comfort, that you’re at greatest risk for being smacked in the face.

I certainly didn’t see Friday’s decline coming, but if you do look at the recent back and forth large movements in energy and precious metals, you have to believe that there are some tectonic plates shifting, as investors see and the flee perceived opportunities in other complexes.

Living and playing near a fault line, people are still shocked when the earth rumbles and are often unprepared for the suddenness.

They also often go back to their old way of doing things after the dust settles. After all, if you believe that you live in paradise, why would you turn your back on that just because of a rumble or two?

How do you resist the ongoing reward so f a paradise that has treated you so well in the past?

The market shook on Friday and there will undoubtedly be more of those rumbles, but it’s hard to not want to go back and take your eye off the obvious.

As usual, the week’s potential stock selections are classified as being in the Traditional, Double Dip Dividend, Momentum or “PEE” categories.

Among the things that no one could possibly have seen as coming would have been the news surrounding Wells Fargo (WFC) this past week.

We do expect banks to sometimes take on strategies that walk a fine line, as there is often great reward when you walk the edge.

We also expect that there may be an occasional employee with larceny in his heart who takes advantage of whatever exists to be exploited. Sometimes, there are even small groups of employees working toward illicit ends, such as in the cult film “Office Space.”

But what we don’t expect is that there may be 5,000 employees working toward such illicit ends, opening credit accounts on behalf of unknowing consumers and certainly without their consent and only to their detriment.

We also don’t expect that such an undertaking could possibly have flown under the radar at any company. People being people, you might expect that one of those 5,000 would have made an inopportune comment that would have been overheard by a supervisor, or at least a co-worker who was not sympathetic to such a violation of trust.

Wells Fargo, for its part fired 5,000 people.

They paid a $185 million fine on a profit of about $23 billion.

That’s the rough equivalent of a miserly tip at an “Early Bird Special” and is probably less than the personnel savings over the course of a year.

Of course, there may still be another shoe to drop.

In the meantime, shares fell on Friday. However, while they fell more than others in the financial sector, the decline was right in line with the S&P 500.

If most past egregious corporate errors are any indication, the fines paid are irrelevant and recovery is ahead. Of course, if the market decides to “sell on the news” when the FOMC finally does increase interest rates, there may be yet another shoe.

In the meantime, the sell-off on Friday may offer a near term opportunity, as options premiums are reflecting increased risk, even as the financial sector may be in line to finally realize the potential that has been pegged to a rising interest rate environment.

There is no doubt that retail is challenged right now and even a vaunted retailer like Macy’s (M) is hurting and shuttering scores of stores in response to the challenges coming from the wall-less retailer behemoth.

I already own 2 lots of Macy’s and with its continued recent weakness and an upcoming ex-dividend date, see the opportunity to add even more shares.

Just as Wells Fargo and others are bound to benefit from an increasing interest rate environment, Macy’s should start benefiting from a more engaged consumer, assuming that the FOMC’s decision to raise interest rates is partially based upon evidence of that occurring.

As with banks, the retail hypothesis has been incubating for a long, long time. The expectations that both would thrive as the economy started heating up, is making many grow weary.

Still, Macy’s is making some hard choices and there should be some reward accruing to its bottom line, even as revenues will fall.

What we have seen during the most recent earnings season is that the investor is willing to over-react to any retail news, but were especially eager to reward anything resembling news that wasn’t as bad as expected or anything resembling positive guidance.

At the first hint of such positive guidance or a better than expected bottom line, a smaller and leaner Macy’s will surge.

What will probably not surge, even if a buyer comes forward, is Twitter (TWTR).

It appears as if a ceiling exists for this company that has a product that many use, but many more do not, because of a lack of understanding of its utility.

If that utility could be understood, perhaps the C-suite at Twitter could then understand how to really monetize the platform, but I’m not entirely certain they would know how to do it if the opportunity stared them in the face.

The near term question about Twitter is just how low the stock can go, as there may be a developing sense of urgency regarding its prospects under its current leadership team.

After having had a great year with Twitter in 2014, both professionally and personally, I use it far less often and trade it far less often.

I still have a very expensive lot of Twitter shares have provided no premium income for far too long, but that I am now likely to put back on the block, even at the risk of losing shares to an assignment price far below the purchase price.

However, with Twitter in sharp focus and with the possibility of a ticking clock, I am interested in adding shares and selling calls or simply selling puts.

If doing so, my intention would be to keep the trade alive and serially selling calls or puts, even if having to roll over to a longer term strike, in the event of another adverse price move.

As with just about every investment, there has to be  consideration of the risk – reward proposition. Twitter, for as far into the future as I can see, will represent significant risk, but I like the idea that there may be a finite time period before desperation really hits the leadership or the Board of Directors.

During that time, there may be multiple opportunities to capitalize on the enhanced option premiums, as long as there is still a belief that Twitter will be an appealing property for someone to own at a price not terribly far below its all time lows.

Finally, if only I could somehow erase a $28 lot of Marathon Oil (MRO) that I still own and that hasn’t produced any income for me lately, Marathon Oil would be may favorite stock.

At least for 2016, as with the assignment of some shares this past week, I’ve now owned it on 7 occasions this year.

At mid-week, even as shares were in the money, I was hoping to be able to roll the shares over, as the premium is still reflective of its volatility, but the risk-reward proposition when it is in the money can be compelling.

How often can you find a situation that even a 3-4% decline in share price could still deliver a 1% ROI for a week, during a week when there is no particular news or company related events, such as earnings, scheduled?

As the week wore on and Marathon Oil went well above my $15 strike, the reward for the rollover could no longer keep up with the opportunity costs of passing up a chance to take the assignment proceeds and plow them into something else.

But with Friday’s plunge the opportunity costs were erased. It was just that I couldn’t get the trade made, not that I didn’t want to get it made.

That, though, leads to Monday morning and I would be eager to add Marathon Oil, in some form, back into my portfolio in the event of any additional weakness.

Even if that weakness is subdued and even if there is continued downside as energy prices may continue their volatility and propensity for short term spikes and plunges, there is nice liquidity in the options and lots of opportunity to tailor a strategy using extended weekly options, if necessary.

In the event of some weakness, I may be inclined to consider the sale of puts, rather than a traditional buy/write, but that decision could be altered by a penny or two difference in the net costs.

While I still bemoan that $28 lot and still hold out some hopes of getting it to again become a contributing member of my income producing portfolio, these cheaper lots of Marathon Oil have helped to soften the pain.

While some think of the process of adding shares when they have plunged, as “throwing good money after bad,” I still think of it as “having a child to save a life.”

Traditional Stocks: Wells Fargo

Momentum Stocks: Marathon Oil, Twitter

Double-Dip Dividend: Macy’s (9/13 $0.38)

Premiums Enhanced by Earnings: none

Remember, these are just guidelines for the coming week. The above selections may become actionable – most often coupling a share purchase with call option sales or the sale of covered put contracts – in adjustment to and consideration of market movements. The overriding objective is to create a healthy income stream for the week, with reduction of trading risk.

Week In Review – September 5 – 9, 2016

 

Option to Profit

Week in Review

 

September 5 – 9, 2016

NEW POSITIONS/STO NEW STO ROLLOVERS CALLS ASSIGNED/PUTS EXPIRED CALLS EXPIRED/PUTS ASSIGNED CLOSED EX-DIVIDEND
1  /  1 0 1 1   /   0 1  /   0 0 6

 

Weekly Up to Date Performance

September 5 – 9, 2016

Up until today, it was looking like any other week we’ve seen after the post-Brexit euphoria.

That is, basically nothing to report and very little actually happening.

Then came Friday and a little bit of a meltdown.

Last week, i said that the market showed no character.

This week, if it did have any character, it was the kind that would run for the doors or hide underneath the bed and do so for no reason, at all.

Still, for some odd reason, I found a reason to open a new position and did so during the final 3 hours of trading for the week.

That might be even more odd.

That new position was 0.6% higher, while the adjusted S&P 500 was 2.5% lower for the week and the unadjusted S&P 500 was 2.4% lower.

The new position out-performed the unadjusted S&P 500 by 2.9% and the unadjusted S&P 500 by 3.0%.

For me, it was actually a good week from a trading perspective.

There were 6 ex-dividend positions, one rollover, an assignment and a closed out position.

Unfortunately, there was also an expired position that will now be looking for an opportunity to generate some income.

What was shaping up to be a good week on the bottom line also fell apart on Friday, as the market tumbled.

Existing positions still managed to beat the market by an unusually large 1.8%, but were still 0.6% lower on the week.

With the closing of the old MolyCorp position, the performance of positions closed in 2016 got quite a hit. Additionally, the accounting for the closed EMC position is a little complex, as the spin off entity is accounted for separately and remains open.

With that said, positions closed in 2016 have gone from a 279% out-performance to a % under-performance.

Those positions are now 2.8% lower, while the comparable performance for the S&P 500 during the same holding periods has been 6.8% higher. That represents a -141.3%% difference in return on closed positions. 


Well, this turned out to be an interesting week, thanks to a single day.

There really wasn’t very much to account for the broad sell-off on Friday, except maybe for exhaustion.

I’m sure we’ll hear about some technical signal and we’ll certainly hear the phrase “profit taking,” but there was still no tangible reason for the fear expressed today.

Still it was fairly orderly, as we’re still about 20 points higher on the S&P 500 from where we were when the market first sent into its Brexit decline.

All in all, I was happy for the way the week went, though.

While the market went lower, that’s reversible.

What can’t be taken away are the dividends and the premiums for the week and some cash generation from the assigned and closed positions.

The one new position opened this week with just 3 hours left in trading, was specifically to either capture the dividend or capture the premium.

maybe both.

If only the premium is captured due to early assignment, I thought that the ROI for a single day of holding was enough to warrant the trade, although in this case, I would rather get the dividend, as well and have the oppportunity to do something else with those shares next Friday.

We still have another 10 days or so to go until the next FOMC meeting, so I’m not certain that Friday’s sell-off will be the last between now and 2 PM on that Wednesday.

Even with some money in cash reserves, I may be hesitant to put any more on the line.

To some degree, it’s a little easier sitting on the sidelines next week because there are another 5 ex-dividend positions and  and 5 expiring positions that at the moment show some promise for a combination of assignments and rollovers.

That may be enough to keep me occupied, although I thought the same this week and look what happened.

This week’s details may be seen in the Weekly Performance spreadsheet * or in the PDF file, as well as in the summary below

(Note: Duplicate mention of positions reflects different priced lots):



New Positions Opened:  HPQ

Puts Closed in order to take profits:  none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the next weekly cycle:   none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into extended weekly cycle:  BBY

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the monthly cycle: none

Calls Rolled Over, taking profits, into a future monthly cycle:  none

Calls Rolled Up, taking net profits into same cyclenone

New STO: none

Put contracts expired: none

Put contracts rolled over: none

Long term call contracts sold:  none

Calls Assigned:  MRO

Calls Expired:  ANF

Puts Assigned:  none

Stock positions Closed to take profits:  none

Stock positions Closed to take losses: EMC

Calls Closed to Take Profits: none

Ex-dividend Positions   BBY (9/9 $0.28), GM (9/7 $0.38), GME (9/7 $0.37), MOS (9/6 $0.275), WY (9/7 $0.31), COH (9/8 $0.33)

Ex-dividend Positions Next Week: HPQ (9/12 $0.12), M (9/13 $0.38), NEM (9/13 $0.025), BBBY (9/14 $0.125), JOY (9/15 $0.01)

For the coming week the existing positions have lots that still require the sale of contracts:   AGQ, ANF, AZN, BBBY, BBY, CHK, CLF, COH, CSCO,  CY, DOW, FAST, FCX, GDX, GM, GPS, HAL, HFC, HPQ, INTC, IP, JCP, JOY, KMI, KSS, LVS, MCPIQ, MOS, NEM, RIG, WFM, WLTGQ, WY (See “Weekly Performance” spreadsheet or PDF file)



* If you don’t have a program to read or modify spreadsheets, you can download the OpenOffice Suite at no cost.



Week in Review – August 29 – September 2, 2016

 

Option to Profit

Week in Review

 

August 29 – September 2, 2016

 

NEW POSITIONS/STO NEW STO ROLLOVERS CALLS ASSIGNED/PUTS EXPIRED CALLS EXPIRED/PUTS ASSIGNED CLOSED EX-DIVIDEND
1  /  1 0 0 0   /   0 0  /   0 0 4

 

Weekly Up to Date Performance

August 29 – September 2, 2016

The market showed a little bit of strength this week, but it showed no character.

The strength that it showed was pretty superficial, though, and doesn’t necessarily translate into anything reliable in the coming week.

It was another week of some, although not much, personal happiness in terms of performance and cash generation.

It was another week with a new position opened, a rarity for 2016.

Like the week preceding, that purchase was an after earnings report release and like the  previous week, the decline in the shares continued.

Hopefully, like the stock from the previous week, the next week will have a rebound and eliminate any regrets.

This week’s new purchase position was 4.0% lower. It trailed the unadjusted S&P 500 by 4.5% and the adjusted S&P 500 by 4.0%

On the week, the unadjusted S&P 500 was up 0.5%, while the adjusted S&P 500 was unchanged.

Existing stocks struggled to keep up with the unadjusted S&P 500, but still it was a good week.

That’s mostly because asset value continued to go higher and did so without oil and commodities 

It was also, however, due to 4 ex-dividend positions.

Since there were no new closed positions for the week, the tally remains the same. Those positions closed in 2016 are still 6.8% higher, while the comparable performance for the S&P 500 during the same holding periods has been 1.8% higher. That represents a 279% difference in return on closed positions. 


The market was mostly treading water this week as it awaited the release of the Employment Situation Report.

That was understandable, particularly as there was good reason to believe that the report could spell the difference between an interest rate hike now, and maybe another before year’s end, or just a single rate hike in Decemer.

It was really anyone’s guess how the market would react to extreme numbers at either end of the spectrum, but its true colors really came out as the slightly disappointing numbers were greeted vary well and then when there was reason to believe that the weak numbers still didn’t rule out a September rate increase, the warm welcome was withdrawn.

No character.

At least not the kind of character you would want to associate with for very long.

With 2 positions set to expire next week and 5 ex-dividend positions and absolutely no idea of what drives the market at this point other than the FOMC’s upcoming meeting in a few weeks, I have no great need to open any new positions next week.

I would be fine with either seeing assignments or keeping the 2 expiring positions in contention to generate more option premium income.

With a holiday shortened week and volatility so low, the premiums aren’t going to be very spectacular anyway, so it might just be a good week to be a casual observer and then just casually take any opportunity that comes along for any existing, but uncovered positions.

That sounds like a plan.

Happy Labor Day.



This week’s details may be seen in the Weekly Performance spreadsheet * or in the PDF file, as well as in the summary below

(Note: Duplicate mention of positions reflects different priced lots):



New Positions Opened:  ANF

Puts Closed in order to take profits:  none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the next weekly cycle:   none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into extended weekly cycle:  none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the monthly cycle: none

Calls Rolled Over, taking profits, into a future monthly cycle:  none

Calls Rolled Up, taking net profits into same cyclenone

New STO: none

Put contracts expired: none

Put contracts rolled over: none

Long term call contracts sold:  none

Calls Assigned:  none

Calls Expired:  none

Puts Assigned:  none

Stock positions Closed to take profits:  none

Stock positions Closed to take losses: none

Calls Closed to Take Profits: none

Ex-dividend Positions   ANF (8/31 $0.20), BAC (8/31 $0.05), HAL (9/2 $0.18), KSS (9/2 $0.52)

Ex-dividend Positions Next Week: BBY (9/9 $0.28), GM (9/7 $0.38), MOS (9/6 $0.275), WY (9/7 $0.31), COH (9/8 $0.33)

For the coming week the existing positions have lots that still require the sale of contracts:   AGQ, ANF, AZN, BBBY, BBY, CHK, CLF, COH, CSCO,  CY, DOW, FAST, FCX, GDX, GM, GPS, HAL, HFC, HPQ, INTC, IP, JCP, JOY, KMI, KSS, LVS, MCPIQ, MOS, NEM, RIG, WFM, WLTGQ, WY (See “Weekly Performance” spreadsheet or PDF file)



* If you don’t have a program to read or modify spreadsheets, you can download the OpenOffice Suite at no cost.



Week in Review – August 22 – 26, 2016

Option to Profit

Week in Review

 

 

August 22 – 26, 2016

 

 

 

 

NEW POSITIONS/STO NEW STO ROLLOVERS CALLS ASSIGNED/PUTS EXPIRED CALLS EXPIRED/PUTS ASSIGNED CLOSED EX-DIVIDEND
1  /  1 2 2 0   /   0 0  /   0 0 0

 

Weekly Up to Date Performance

August 22 – 26, 2016

This wasn’t exactly another in a series of flat weeks, but it was somewhat of a disappointment.

As far as the market goes, that is.

I was personally pretty happy, though.

For starters, there was actually a new purchase for the week, even as it came in its final hours.

That new purchase was 2.0% higher on the week and beat the unadjusted S&P 500 by 0.6% and the unadjusted S&P 500 by 2.2%

The unadjusted S&P 500 was 0.6% lower on the week and the adjusted S&P 500 was 0.1% lower.

Still it was a good week.

But that’s only because existing positions didn’t lose as much as the S&P 500.

They still lost value, though.

But, as is usually the case, in the longer term, your portfolio serves you better by its ability to outperform during declines.

What was good was that there were 2 rollovers and 2 positions had new calls written on them, while some others are now within striking distance of becoming contributing members once again to my coffers.

There were no ex-dividend positions, but that changes next week.

Since there were no new closed positions for the week, the tally remains the same. Those positions closed in 2016 are still 6.8% higher, while the comparable performance for the S&P 500 during the same holding periods has been 1.8% higher. That represents a 279% difference in return on closed positions. Once again,  I’d be much more impressed if there were far more of those closed positions to point toward. With such few closed positions for the year, the differential could just as easily have been in the other direction and of a similar magnitude, yet also signifying little.

The market was really all over the place on Friday as the festivities at Jackson Hole came to their end.

What looked like it was going to be the gain to deliver the week from a loss turned out to be a loss that just compounded the mild losses from earlier in the week.

I was still pretty happy about things.

I had the surprising opportunity to trade far more than I thought would be the case.

Some rollovers, some new short positions and even dipping into cash a little bit to open a new position, as well.

It was no accident that the new position is paying a nice dividend in a week or so, though.

I do want those dividends these days as volatility is really drying up the premiums.

As I look at my expiration dates on outstanding short positions, I can’t even begin to recognize myself, as there are so many being written a month, two months or even longer out, instead of the weekly calls that i had really grown to cherish.

With still some cash to invest, I don’t mind the prospect of doing so next week.

With no expiring positions, I would like to have some opportunity to generate some more income, although there is some comfort knowing that there are a number of ex-dividend positions next week and for the remainder of September.

Following Friday’s words from Janet Yellen, Stanley Fischer and the GDP release, it’s hard to really know where the economy is and what the FOMC will be looking at, as far as its time table for an interest rate increase.

From the market’s reaction today, it’s clear that there are multiple sides to the story, multiple interpretations and multiple reactions.

 

 

This week’s details may be seen in the Weekly Performance spreadsheet * or in the PDF file, as well as in the summary below

(Note: Duplicate mention of positions reflects different priced lots):

New Positions Opened:  GME

Puts Closed in order to take profits:  none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the next weekly cycle:   none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into extended weekly cycle:  MRO (9/26)

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the monthly cycle: GDX (10/21)

Calls Rolled Over, taking profits, into a future monthly cycle:  none

Calls Rolled Up, taking net profits into same cyclenone

New STO: INTC (11/2016), MS (11/2016)

Put contracts expired: MRO

Put contracts rolled over: none

Long term call contracts sold:  none

Calls Assigned:  none

Calls Expired:  none

Puts Assigned:  none

Stock positions Closed to take profits:  none

Stock positions Closed to take losses: none

Calls Closed to Take Profits: none

Ex-dividend Positions   none

Ex-dividend Positions Next Week: ANF (8/31 $0.20), BAC (8/31 $0.05), HAL (9/2 $0.18), KSS (9/2 $0.52)

For the coming week the existing positions have lots that still require the sale of contracts:   AGQ, ANF, AZN, BBBY, BBY, CHK, CLF, COH, CSCO,  CY, DOW, FAST, FCX, GDX, GM, GPS, HAL, HFC, HPQ, INTC, IP, JCP, JOY, KMI, KSS, LVS, MCPIQ, MOS, NEM, RIG, WFM, WLTGQ, WY (See “Weekly Performance” spreadsheet or PDF file)

* If you don’t have a program to read or modify spreadsheets, you can download the OpenOffice Suite at no cost.

Week In Review – August 15 – 19, 2016

 

Option to Profit

Week in Review

 

August 15 – 19, 2016

 

NEW POSITIONS/STO NEW STO ROLLOVERS CALLS ASSIGNED/PUTS EXPIRED CALLS EXPIRED/PUTS ASSIGNED CLOSED EX-DIVIDEND
0  /  0 0 0 0   /   1 1  /   0 0 2

 

Weekly Up to Date Performance

August 15 – 19, 2016

This was yet another in a series of flat weeks, but it was another in which my complaints may fall on deaf ears.

This was another week of no new purchases and so again there wasn’t too much to think or talk about.

The S&P 500 was down 0.3% for the week and other than a little bit of action following the release of FOMC minutes, there was nothing of any interest for the rest of the week.

Still it was a good week.

There were 2 ex-dividend positions and the expiration of those puts that had been serially rolled over, after having gone out on a little bit of a limb by having rolled them over the previous week even though they were going to expire..

On top of that, even as the market was flat, existing positions again beat the S&P 500, this time by an additional 0.4%. even though that meant that the only finished 0.1% higher for the week.

With the expiration of those puts that added one additional position to the paltry list of closed lots for 2016. Those positions closed in 2016 are still 6.8% higher, while the comparable performance for the S&P 500 during the same holding periods has been 1.8% higher. That represents a 279% difference in return on closed positions. Once again,  I’d be much more impressed if there were far more of those closed positions to point toward. With such few closed positions for the year, the differential could just as easily have been in the other direction and of a similar magnitude, yet also signifying little.

With this week’s small advance. it does at least add to the nice performance thus far in 2016.

That’s better than the alternative, although this past week wasn’t one for generating very much in the way of income.

It wasn’t really a week for generating much of anything, including anything of interest.

While there may be some more signs that the FOMC is going to be able to find reason to increase interest rates, no one is really getting excited or getting frightened.

For the most part earnings season is now over and for the most part is was fairly disappointing.

What may have been most disappointing is that no one seemed to offer anything positive for the rest of 2016.

On the one hand that could set us up for some positive surprises three months from now, but for now it didn’t really offer any kind of catalyst to move higher.

Still, we’re just a hair from those all time closing highs, so something must be going right.

With the expiration of those puts I do have some additional cash that I wouldn’t mind putting to use, although it’s not likely to get any easier next week, just as the past couple of weeks have been difficult to really identify anything with a reward worth the risk.

With no ex-dividend positions next week and the likelihood of the assignment of a short call position, it would be really nice to find something to invest in, but that likely share assignment makes me think that together with the expiration of puts this week, it might e a good time to collect some cash.



This week’s details may be seen in the Weekly Performance spreadsheet * or in the PDF file, as well as in the summary below

(Note: Duplicate mention of positions reflects different priced lots):



New Positions Opened:  none

Puts Closed in order to take profits:  none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the next weekly cycle:   none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into extended weekly cycle:  none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the monthly cycle: none

Calls Rolled Over, taking profits, into a future monthly cycle:  none

Calls Rolled Up, taking net profits into same cyclenone

New STO: none

Put contracts expired: MRO

Put contracts rolled over: none

Long term call contracts sold:  none

Calls Assigned:  none

Calls Expired:  FAST

Puts Assigned:  none

Stock positions Closed to take profits:  none

Stock positions Closed to take losses: none

Calls Closed to Take Profits: none

Ex-dividend Positions   MRO (8/15 $0.05), HFC (8/19 $0.33)

Ex-dividend Positions Next Week: none

For the coming week the existing positions have lots that still require the sale of contracts:   AGQ, ANF, AZN, BBBY, BBY, CHK, CLF, COH, CSCO,  CY, DOW, FAST, FCX, GDX, GM, GPS, HAL, HFC, HPQ, INTC, IP, JCP, JOY, KMI, KSS, LVS, MCPIQ, MOS, NEM, RIG, WFM, WLTGQ, WY (See “Weekly Performance” spreadsheet or PDF file)



* If you don’t have a program to read or modify spreadsheets, you can download the OpenOffice Suite at no cost.



Week In Review – August 8 – 12, 2016

 

Option to Profit

Week in Review

 

August 8 – 12, 2016

 

NEW POSITIONS/STO NEW STO ROLLOVERS CALLS ASSIGNED/PUTS EXPIRED CALLS EXPIRED/PUTS ASSIGNED CLOSED EX-DIVIDEND
0  /  0 0 2 0   /   0 0  /   0 0 2

 

Weekly Up to Date Performance

August 8 – 12, 2016

When I thought that this week had the makings of a flat one, I didn’t realize just how flat it might be.

Despite all major indexes hitting a record high on the week, it wasn’t very exciting other than for some good retailer price action, even as the retail numbers themselves weren’t overly impressive.

Maybe not even impressive in the slightest.

This was another week of no new purchases and so there wasn’t too much to think or talk about.

That’s not exciting, either.

The S&P 500 was actually up 0.1% for the week after looking as if it would close perfectly flat until the final 20 minutes or so for the week.

Still it was a good week.

There were 2 ex-dividend positions and 2 rollovers, including a rare rollover of a short put position that was going to expire.

On top of that, even as the market was flat, existing positions again beat the S&P 500, this time by an additional 0.6%.

With  no  new closed positions on the week closed positions in 2016 are still 6.8% higher, while the comparable performance for the S&P 500 during the same holding periods has been 1.9% higher. That represents a 267% difference in return on closed positions. As with every week in 2016, I’d be much more impressed if there were far more of those closed positions to point toward. With such few closed positions for the year, the differential could just as easily have been in the other direction and of a similar magnitude, yet also signifying little.

I could get used to seeing 2017 being a repeat of 2016, at least year to date.

I definitely like seeing the increase in net asset value and would certainly like to see more in the way of trading activity, but there was enough this week to keep me from hitting the streets.

There was an opportunity to rollover the position in International Paper a week early in order to have a better chance of holding onto the very nice dividend.

Additionally, I found reason to want to rollover the short put position in Marathon Oil, despite it heading for an expiration.

The reason for that was the same as the reason for rolling over short call some positions that are likely to otherwise be assigned.

That’s because volatility makes the forward week premiums a bit richer than the expiring premium which ends up basically representing only intrinsic value.

Even with Marathon Oil being ex-dividend on Monday, the ROI for the additional week was another 1.3% and keeps the position alive and accumulating premiums.

At this point, that’s good enough for me.

If I can’t make it up in the volume of trades, maybe I can make it up in the lack of variety in the positions.

Marathon Oil has been just about the only play over the past 2 months or so.

But that works, too.

In fact, it almost totally takes the thought process out of the process, which makes it even better.

With 2 ex-dividend positions this week and another 2 next week and now 2 potential rollovers, there should be some cash coming in, but I would still love to be able to open some new positions.

Maybe even a single new position would be enough, given the paucity of trades lately.


This week’s details may be seen in the Weekly Performance spreadsheet * or in the PDF file, as well as in the summary below

(Note: Duplicate mention of positions reflects different priced lots):



New Positions Opened:  none

Puts Closed in order to take profits:  none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the next weekly cycle:   none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into extended weekly cycle:  none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the monthly cycle: none

Calls Rolled Over, taking profits, into a future monthly cycle:  IP (9/2016)

Calls Rolled Up, taking net profits into same cyclenone

New STO: none

Put contracts expired: none

Put contracts rolled over: MRO (8/19)

Long term call contracts sold:  none

Calls Assigned:  none

Calls Expired:  none

Puts Assigned:  none

Stock positions Closed to take profits:  none

Stock positions Closed to take losses: none

Calls Closed to Take Profits: none

Ex-dividend Positions   AZN (8/10 $0.44), IP (8/11 $0.44)

Ex-dividend Positions Next Week: MRO (8/15 $0.05), HFC (8/19 $0.33)

For the coming week the existing positions have lots that still require the sale of contracts:   AGQ, ANF, AZN, BBBY, BBY, CHK, CLF, COH, CSCO,  CY, DOW, FAST, FCX, GDX, GM, GPS, HAL, HFC, HPQ, INTC, IP, JCP, JOY, KMI, KSS, LVS, MCPIQ, MOS, NEM, RIG, WFM, WLTGQ, WY (See “Weekly Performance” spreadsheet or PDF file)



* If you don’t have a program to read or modify spreadsheets, you can download the OpenOffice Suite at no cost.



Week In Review – August 1 – 5, 2016

 

Option to Profit

Week in Review

 

August 1 – 5, 2016

 

NEW POSITIONS/STO NEW STO ROLLOVERS CALLS ASSIGNED/PUTS EXPIRED CALLS EXPIRED/PUTS ASSIGNED CLOSED EX-DIVIDEND
0  /  0 0 0 0   /   0 0  /   0 0 2

 

Weekly Up to Date Performance

August 1 – 5, 2016

After a string of consecutive small daily losses, the market finally broke out and closed the week at another new record closing high.

That’s the sort of thing that it had gotten used to just a couple of weeks ago and did so back then on virtually no news of note.

This time, though, there was a catalyst.

It was the Employment Situation Report which ended up fueling a nearly 200 point rise in the DJIA as both the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ 100 hit their new closing record highs.

But for all of the excitement on Friday, the S&P 500 only closed 0.4% higher on the week.

With no new trades for the week, I did virtually nothing but watch the inaction for the first 4 days of the week and the excitement to end the week.

There was just a single new sale of calls on an uncovered position and only two ex-dividend positions, but there was still a little something for everyone, even as oil was weak for much of the week.

With  no  new closed positions on the week closed positions in 2016 are still 6.8% higher, while the comparable performance for the S&P 500 during the same holding periods has been 1.9% higher. That represents a 267% difference in return on closed positions. As with every week in 2016, I’d be much more impressed if there were far more of those closed positions to point toward. With such few closed positions for the year, the differential could just as easily have been in the other direction and of a similar magnitude, yet also signifying little.

It’s hard to know what to make of this week.

It’s clear that the market has said that it is finally ready to move on and can live with an increase in interest rates, as long as that means that the economy is finally heading in the right direction.

The Employment Situation Report gave another good number and at least that’s pointing in the right direction, even as the GDP isn’t

Next week begins retailer reports and this week wasn’t entirely kind to those companies that really depend on consumers, just as the GDP depends on consumers.

So we’ll see what the next 2 weeks bring and what kind of future is painted by the retail giants.

I have some money to spend and with only a single expiring position and 2 ex-dividend positions, I wouldn’t mind finding some additional source of weekly income.

But after this week’s big news, what’s left to push markets higher.

With earnings season just a bout over, maybe the real boost could come if the retailers can paint an optimistic picture over the next few days.

I don’t know if I want to get ahead of any of those earnings reports, though.

The recent losing streak and the small cumulative loss it created, may however, have been enough to create a base camp for the next climb higher, especially if retail plays along.

If it does, I don’t mind getting carried along and would especially like it if oil were to make up some of what it lost in the past couple of weeks.

That would really add to the nice personal gains so far in 2016.

 



This week’s details may be seen in the Weekly Performance spreadsheet * or in the PDF file, as well as in the summary below

(Note: Duplicate mention of positions reflects different priced lots):



New Positions Opened:  none

Puts Closed in order to take profits:  none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the next weekly cycle:   none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into extended weekly cycle:  none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the monthly cycle: none

Calls Rolled Over, taking profits, into a future monthly cycle:  none

Calls Rolled Up, taking net profits into same cyclenone

New STO: WY (10/21/2016)

Put contracts expired: none

Put contracts rolled over: none

Long term call contracts sold:  none

Calls Assigned:  none

Calls Expired:  none

Puts Assigned:  none

Stock positions Closed to take profits:  none

Stock positions Closed to take losses: none

Calls Closed to Take Profits: none

Ex-dividend Positions   INTC (8/3 $0.26), BP (8/3 $0.595)

Ex-dividend Positions Next Week: AZN (8/8 $0.44), IP (8/11 $0.44)

For the coming week the existing positions have lots that still require the sale of contracts:   AGQ, ANF, AZN, BBBY, BBY, CHK, CLF, COH, CSCO,  CY, DOW, FAST, FCX, GDX, GM, GPS, HAL, HFC, HPQ, INTC, IP, JCP, JOY, KMI, KSS, LVS, MCPIQ, MOS, NEM, RIG, WFM, WLTGQ, WY (See “Weekly Performance” spreadsheet or PDF file)



* If you don’t have a program to read or modify spreadsheets, you can download the OpenOffice Suite at no cost.



Week in Review – July 25 – 29, 2016

 

Option to Profit

Week in Review

 

July 25 – 29, 2016

 

NEW POSITIONS/STO NEW STO ROLLOVERS CALLS ASSIGNED/PUTS EXPIRED CALLS EXPIRED/PUTS ASSIGNED CLOSED EX-DIVIDEND
0  /  0 3 3 0   /   0 0  /   0 0 3

 

Weekly Up to Date Performance

July 18 – 22, 2016


Maybe this week wasn’t another one of  one record after another, but it was still pretty good.

Even if the market really didn’t move very much.

In this week of an FOMC Statement release and the GDP, no new positions were opened.

While sitting around and conserving cash, the S%P 500 was down 0.1% for the week.

Again, not a very impressive week, but still enough to make me happy

That’s because existing positions again bested the S&P 500, this time by an additional 0.7%, in what was really a good week.

With  no  new closed positions on the week closed positions in 2016 are still 6.8% higher, while the comparable performance for the S&P 500 during the same holding periods has been 1.9% higher. That represents a 267% difference in return on closed positions. As with every week in 2016, I’d be much more impressed if there were far more of those closed positions to point toward. With such few closed positions for the year, the differential could just as easily have been in the other direction and of a similar magnitude, yet also signifying little.

I could get used to repeating this week after week.

This was another good week in what continues to be a good year, despite not opening any new positions this week.

It’s always nice to see asset values rise some more, but I still prefer to have some activity accompany the gains and this week there was plenty of activity.

It almost felt like the good old days.

This week had 3 rollovers and 3 positions had calls sold on them.

On top of those, there were 3 ex-dividend positions, so it was a fairly good week despite the market itself doing nothing of consequence.

Being still so close to at all time highs I’m not eager to put too much at risk in the chase as next week is set to begin.

The only problem is that there are no expiring positions next week and only 2 ex-dividend positions, so I’m hoping that something else will pop up.

I’d especially like to add to the list of positions with outstanding short calls written against them.

I’ve been patiently waiting for a long time for that to be the case and am happily seeing the end result of all of the hoping and crossed fingers.

Next week may be a quiet one, but if oil can reverse course, it could be the lift that the market needs to break through its recent highs and I wouldn’t mind continuing along for the ride.



This week’s details may be seen in the Weekly Performance spreadsheet * or in the PDF file, as well as in the summary below

(Note: Duplicate mention of positions reflects different priced lots):



New Positions Opened:  none

Puts Closed in order to take profits:  none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the next weekly cycle:   none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into extended weekly cycle:  MRO (8/26)

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the monthly cycle: HPQ (10/21)

Calls Rolled Over, taking profits, into a future monthly cycle:  none

Calls Rolled Up, taking net profits into same cyclenone

New STO: none

Put contracts expired: none

Put contracts rolled over: MRO (8/12)

Long term call contracts sold:  none

Calls Assigned:  none

Calls Expired:  none

Puts Assigned:  none

Stock positions Closed to take profits:  none

Stock positions Closed to take losses: none

Calls Closed to Take Profits: none

Ex-dividend Positions   F (7/27 $0.15), MS (7/28 $0.20), KMI (7/29 $0.125)

Ex-dividend Positions Next Week: INTC (8/3 $0.26), BP (8/3 $0.595)

For the coming week the existing positions have lots that still require the sale of contracts:   AGQ, ANF, AZN, BBBY, BBY, CHK, CLF, COH, CSCO,  CY, DOW, FAST, FCX, GDX, GM, GPS, HAL, HFC, HPQ, INTC, IP, JCP, JOY, KMI, KSS, LVS, MCPIQ, MOS, NEM, RIG, WFM, WLTGQ, WY (See “Weekly Performance” spreadsheet or PDF file)



* If you don’t have a program to read or modify spreadsheets, you can download the OpenOffice Suite at no cost.



Daily Market Update – July 22, 2016

 

Option to Profit

Week in Review

 

July 18 – 22, 2016

 

NEW POSITIONS/STO NEW STO ROLLOVERS CALLS ASSIGNED/PUTS EXPIRED CALLS EXPIRED/PUTS ASSIGNED CLOSED EX-DIVIDEND
0  /  1 0 2 0   /   0 0  /   0 0 1

 

Weekly Up to Date Performance

July 18 – 22, 2016


Records, records and more records.

That’s how last week ended and so did this week.

In the post-Brexit world this was just another in a series of good weeks.

Once again, there was only one position opened this week and it was also once again a familiar one.

That’s also exactly what I said last week, but that’s actually the ideal way a covered option strategy would work and it has been a long time since really being able to serially execute trades in any positions, so it does feel more rewarding than has been the case of late.

That position ended the week 0.6% higher, but could do no better than both the adjusted and unadjusted S&P 500.

The S&P 500, itself, rose another 0.6%.

Maybe not as impressive as previous week, but still enough to make people happy, especially the people that matter most.

Me.

Existing positions bested the S&P 500 by an additional 0.3%, in what was really a good week.

With  no  new closed positions on the week closed positions in 2016 are still 6.8% higher, while the comparable performance for the S&P 500 during the same holding periods has been 1.9% higher. That represents a 267% difference in return on closed positions. As with every week in 2016, I’d be much more impressed if there were far more of those closed positions to point toward. With such few closed positions for the year, the differential could just as easily have been in the other direction and of a similar magnitude, yet also signifying little.

This was another good week in what continues to be a good year, despite very little additional trading this week.

It’s always nice to see asset values rise some more, but I still prefer to have some activity accompany the gains.

Once again, this week had only 1 new position opened and only two rollovers. Unfortunately, despite having some feelers out there, I couldn’t find any buyers for uncovered positions to supplement the scant dividend income for the week..

With only a single ex-dividend positions this week, I would have liked to have had more income generating opportunities, but all in all, I was pleased.

With only one new purchase this week and still having cash from assignments the previous week, I do have some discretionary cash to put to work.

However, we’re still at all time highs and I’m not eager to put too much at risk in the chase.

With 2 positions expiring next week and 3 ex-dividend positions, there may already be sufficient opportunity for income generation to tread lightly, but I’ll still keep an open mind as the FOMC sets the stage for the coming week.

While that does take place on Wednesday, the real event to get some notice may turn out to be Friday’s GDP report.

A strong GDP may give some reason to believe that the FOMC will make an interest rate increase announcement as early as August, even though there is no meeting scheduled and no press conference.

That would catch some off guard and might be construed as more than just mildly inflationary.

But that’s attempting to be logical and logic hasn’t had much of a home for a year or more.

Lots more.



This week’s details may be seen in the Weekly Performance spreadsheet * or in the PDF file, as well as in the summary below

(Note: Duplicate mention of positions reflects different priced lots):



New Positions Opened:  MRO (puts)

Puts Closed in order to take profits:  none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the next weekly cycle:   MRO

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into extended weekly cycle:  none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the monthly cycle: none

Calls Rolled Over, taking profits, into a future monthly cycle:  none

Calls Rolled Up, taking net profits into same cyclenone

New STO: none

Put contracts expired: none

Put contracts rolled over: MRO

Long term call contracts sold:  none

Calls Assigned:  none

Calls Expired:  none

Puts Assigned:  none

Stock positions Closed to take profits:  none

Stock positions Closed to take losses: none

Calls Closed to Take Profits: none

Ex-dividend Positions   FAST (7/22 $0.30)

Ex-dividend Positions Next Week: F (7/27 $0.15), MS (7/28 $0.20), KMI (7/29 $0.125)

For the coming week the existing positions have lots that still require the sale of contracts:   AGQ, ANF, AZN, BBBY, BBY, CHK, CLF, COH, CSCO,  CY, DOW, FAST, FCX, GDX, GM, GPS, HAL, HFC, HPQ, INTC, IP, JCP, JOY, KMI, KSS, LVS, MCPIQ, MOS, NEM, RIG, WFM, WLTGQ, WY (See “Weekly Performance” spreadsheet or PDF file)



* If you don’t have a program to read or modify spreadsheets, you can download the OpenOffice Suite at no cost.



Week in Review – July 11 – 15, 2016

 

Option to Profit

Week in Review

 

July 11 – 15, 2016

 

NEW POSITIONS/STO NEW STO ROLLOVERS CALLS ASSIGNED/PUTS EXPIRED CALLS EXPIRED/PUTS ASSIGNED CLOSED EX-DIVIDEND
0  /  1 1 2 2   /   1 2   /   0 0 1

 

Weekly Up to Date Performance

July 11 – 15, 2016


Records, records and more records.

In the post-Brexit world this was just another good week.

Once again, there was only one position opened this week and it was also once again a familiar one.

That position ended the week 1.7% higher and was 0.2% higher than both the adjusted and unadjusted S&P 500.

The S&P 500, itself, rose another impressive 1.5%. Existing positions bested that by an additional 0.9%, in what was really a good week.

With  3  new closed positions on the week closed positions in 2016 are now 6.8% higher, while the comparable performance for the S&P 500 during the same holding periods has been 1.9% higher. That represents a 267% difference in return on closed positions. Still, even with 3 newly closed positions, I’d be much more impressed if there were far more of those closed positions to point toward.

This was another good week in what is shaping up to be a good year, despite very little trading.

It’s always nice to see asset values rise, but I still prefer to have some activity accompany the gains.

Once again, this week had only 1 new position opened and only two rollovers, but at least it also gave an opportunity to sell some calls on an uncovered position, as well.

With no ex-dividend positions this week, I would have liked to have had more income generating opportunities, but all in all, I was pleased.

With 2 assignments this week and one expired short put, it will be one of those rare weeks ahead where I’ll have substantially more free cash than in a long time.

The real challenge is deciding what to do with free cash after the market has had such a sharp climb higher in such a short period of time.

Even as we had two breathers during the past week, it would have been nice to have seen some profit taking.

I’d be much more inclined to spend some money on Monday if there was some of that profit taking at hand.

With earnings season doing reasonably well as it began, the next 2 weeks will be busy ones and then we get an FOMC meeting to end the month.

Two things that I did this week reminded me of 2012 and 2011.

That was rolling over positions that were headed for assignment.

I did that a lot in those years as the forward volatility was high enough to warrant adding onto the premiums rather than trying to re-invent the wheel and finding new stocks to take their place.

With 3 closed positions this week, I felt that there was enough new cash coming in to allow the rollovers.

Hopefully, that will be something that I won’t regret.


This week’s details may be seen in the Weekly Performance spreadsheet * or in the PDF file, as well as in the summary below

(Note: Duplicate mention of positions reflects different priced lots):



New Positions Opened:  MRO (puts)

Puts Closed in order to take profits:  none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the next weekly cycle:   MRO

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into extended weekly cycle:  none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the monthly cycle: none

Calls Rolled Over, taking profits, into a future monthly cycle:  IP

Calls Rolled Up, taking net profits into same cyclenone

New STO: none

Put contracts expired: MRO

Put contracts rolled over: none

Long term call contracts sold:  none

Calls Assigned:  CSCO, CY

Calls Expired:  M, WY

Puts Assigned:  none

Stock positions Closed to take profits:  none

Stock positions Closed to take losses: none

Calls Closed to Take Profits: none

Ex-dividend Positions   none

Ex-dividend Positions Next Week: FAST (7/22 $0.30)

For the coming week the existing positions have lots that still require the sale of contracts:   AGQ, ANF, AZN, BBBY, BBY, CHK, CLF, COH, CSCO,  CY, DOW, FAST, FCX, GDX, GM, GPS, HAL, HFC, HPQ, INTC, IP, JCP, JOY, KMI, KSS, LVS, MCPIQ, MOS, NEM, RIG, WFM, WLTGQ, WY (See “Weekly Performance” spreadsheet or PDF file)



* If you don’t have a program to read or modify spreadsheets, you can download the OpenOffice Suite at no cost.



Week In Review – July 4 – 8, 2016

 

Option to Profit

Week in Review

 

July 4 – 8, 2016

 

NEW POSITIONS/STO NEW STO ROLLOVERS CALLS ASSIGNED/PUTS EXPIRED CALLS EXPIRED/PUTS ASSIGNED CLOSED EX-DIVIDEND
1  /  1 0 1 0   /   0 0   /   0 0 1

 

Weekly Up to Date Performance

July 4 – 8, 2016


Well, this was another in a series of interesting weeks.

Once again, just when it looked like….

….It turned out not to be that at all.

In fact, it turned out to be another really good week on top of the previous week that was the best week in 2 years, even with Monday’s big decline.

When it was all said and done the week ended within easy striking distance of an all time high.

There was only one position opened this week and it was a familiar one.

That position ended the week 3.9% higher and was 2.6% higher than both the adjusted and unadjusted S&P 500.

The S&P 500, itself, rose an impressive 1.3%

With no new assignments on the week closed positions in 2016 remained 6.8% higher, while the comparable performance for the S&P 500 during the same holding periods has been 1.6% higher. That represents a 337.7% difference in return on closed positions. That would be much more impressive if there were many more closed positions in 2016, but that just hasn’t been the case, although the pace has been slowly increasing

This was another good week.

It’s always nice to see asset values rise, but I still prefer to have some activity accompany the gains.

This week had only 1 new position opened and only a single rollover.

On top of that, there was only a single ex-dividend position, so there wasn’t too much income generation for the week.

Hopefully, some of that can change next week, as the July 2016 option cycle comes to an end and there are a handful of expiring positions.

While there are no ex-dividend positions next week, I do have some cash to spend and maybe some potential for rollovers, as well.

So, as we approach resistance, I’m wary, but still looking forward to the coming week.

Today’s Employment Situation Report was a big surprise, but this time it was a good surprise.

Compared to the horrific number in May, maybe it would be time to stop focusing on a single month’s report, but that’s never going to happen and who knows what next month may bring?

What today’s number could bring is an FOMC one step closer to be willing to pull the trigger and finally commit to raising interest rates.

The market seemed to like that idea today and may trade higher into the FOMC meeting even as those resistance levels loom overhead.

This week’s details may be seen in the Weekly Performance spreadsheet * or in the PDF file, as well as in the summary below

(Note: Duplicate mention of positions reflects different priced lots):



New Positions Opened:  MRO

Puts Closed in order to take profits:  none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the next weekly cycle:   MRO

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into extended weekly cycle:  none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the monthly cycle: none

Calls Rolled Over, taking profits, into a future monthly cycle:  none

Calls Rolled Up, taking net profits into same cyclenone

New STO: none

Put contracts expired: none

Put contracts rolled over: none

Long term call contracts sold:  none

Calls Assigned:  MRO

Calls Expired:  HFC

Puts Assigned:  none

Stock positions Closed to take profits:  none

Stock positions Closed to take losses: none

Calls Closed to Take Profits: none

Ex-dividend Positions   CSCO (7/5 $0.26)

Ex-dividend Positions Next Week: none

For the coming week the existing positions have lots that still require the sale of contracts:   AGQ, ANF, AZN, BBBY, BBY, CHK, CLF, COH, CSCO,  CY, DOW, FAST, FCX, GDX, GM, GPS, HAL, HFC, HPQ, INTC, IP, JCP, JOY, KMI, KSS, LVS, MCPIQ, MOS, NEM, RIG, WFM, WLTGQ, WY (See “Weekly Performance” spreadsheet or PDF file)



* If you don’t have a program to read or modify spreadsheets, you can download the OpenOffice Suite at no cost.



Week In Review – June 27 – July 1, 2016

 

Option to Profit

Week in Review

 

June 27 – July 1, 2016

 

NEW POSITIONS/STO NEW STO ROLLOVERS CALLS ASSIGNED/PUTS EXPIRED CALLS EXPIRED/PUTS ASSIGNED CLOSED EX-DIVIDEND
2  /  2 0 2 2   /   0 0   /   0 0 5

 

Weekly Up to Date Performance

June 27 – July 1, 2016


Well, this was an interesting week.

Just when it looked like….

….It turned out not to be that at all.

In fact, it was the best week in 2 years, even with Monday’s big decline.

When it was all said and done, last week’s decline, which had taken the market back into negative territory for the year with its continued loss to open this week, was once again showing a gain on the year.

There were 2 new positions opened this week and along with most everything else, they went higher, just not high enough as the gains were constrained by the sale of call options.

Those positions were 2.2% higher, finishing 1.0% lower than both the adjusted and unadjusted S&P 500. The basic index ended the week being 3.2% higher, as those 3 post-Brexit days mid-week changed everything.

With 2 new assignments on the week closed positions in 2016 were 6.8% higher, while the comparable performance for the S&P 500 during the same holding periods has been 1.6% higher. That represents a 337.7% difference in return on closed positions. That would be much more impressive if there were many more closed positions in 2016, but that just hasn’t been the case, although the pace has been slowly increasing

This was a good week.

It’s always nice to see asset values rise, but i also like seeing activity.

This week had 2 new positions opened, 2 positions rolled over, 2 positions assigned and 5 ex-dividend positions.

It has been a long time since having that much activity and I enjoyed it immensely.

I also enjoyed seeing the week come to a close on a less effusive note, as it’s always more comforting to see support levels being established, rather than meteoric moves higher.

Those are hard to sustain, especially if there continues to be overhead resistance and there is definitely overhead resistance ahead.

With a couple of assignments this week, I would welcome some more opportunity to add new positions, but with volatility again dropping, it may be difficult to find anything suitable, especially with only 4 days of premium ahead of us next week.

Then again, I didn’t think that there would be much chance of spending money this week and things turned out very differently.

With only a single ex-dividend position next week and no positions set to expire, I might succumb to the desire to generate some additional revenue.

If so, that would mean having to recycle some of the money from this week’s assignments.

As has been the case lately, I wouldn’t mind recycling the money right back into positions that had just gotten assigned if there is any early price weakness as the week gets underway.

That has been a pretty good formula lately, especially in those positions that still had some reasonable volatility associated with them.

Otherwise, it may end up being a quiet week, as has been the case for much of 2016.

I hope that whatever next week brings, it does bring a happy and safe Fourth of July to all.


This week’s details may be seen in the Weekly Performance spreadsheet * or in the PDF file, as well as in the summary below

(Note: Duplicate mention of positions reflects different priced lots):



New Positions Opened:  EBAY, MRO

Puts Closed in order to take profits:  none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the next weekly cycle: none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into extended weekly cycle:  none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the monthly cycle: none

Calls Rolled Over, taking profits, into a future monthly cycle:  GDX, NEM

Calls Rolled Up, taking net profits into same cyclenone

New STO: STX

Put contracts expired: none

Put contracts rolled over: none

Long term call contracts sold:  none

Calls Assigned:  MRO

Calls Expired:  HFC

Puts Assigned:  none

Stock positions Closed to take profits:  none

Stock positions Closed to take losses: none

Calls Closed to Take Profits: none

Ex-dividend Positions   CY (6/28 $0.11), DOW (6/28 $0.46), EMC (6/29 $0.11), WFM (6/29 $0.14), GPS (7/1 $0.23)

Ex-dividend Positions Next Week: CSCO (7/5 $0.26)

For the coming week the existing positions have lots that still require the sale of contracts:   AGQ, ANF, AZN, BBBY, BBY, CHK, CLF, COH, CSCO,  CY, DOW, FAST, FCX, GDX, GM, GPS, HAL, HFC, HPQ, INTC, IP, JCP, JOY, KMI, KSS, LVS, MCPIQ, MOS, NEM, RIG, WFM, WLTGQ, WY (See “Weekly Performance” spreadsheet or PDF file)



* If you don’t have a program to read or modify spreadsheets, you can download the OpenOffice Suite at no cost.



Week In Review – June 20 – 24, 2016

 

Option to Profit

Week in Review

 

June 20 – 24, 2016

 

NEW POSITIONS/STO NEW STO ROLLOVERS CALLS ASSIGNED/PUTS EXPIRED CALLS EXPIRED/PUTS ASSIGNED CLOSED EX-DIVIDEND
1  /  1 1 0 1   /   0 1   /   0 0 2

 

Weekly Up to Date Performance

June 20 – 24, 2016


Last week it was hard to understand what had happened.

This week it was easy.

When it was all said and done today’s decline took 2016 negative for the year.

What may be sadder is that it only took a 3.6% loss to do that at this point in the year.

There was a new position opened this week and somehow it managed to stay above water. That position was 3.2% higher, finishing 4.8% higher than both the adjusted and unadjusted S&P 500. The basic index ended the week being 1.6% lower, as its good gain for the week was obliterated on Friday.

Existing positions were 0.7% higher than the S&P 500 for the week, however, that meant they still lost 0.9%.

With a single new assignment on the week closed positions in 2016 were 8.0% higher, while the comparable performance for the S&P 500 during the same holding periods has been 1.2% higher. That represents a completely ridiculous 593.8% difference in return on closed positions. That would be much more impressive if there were many more closed positions in 2016, but that just hasn’t been the case.

Even as existing positions lost 0.9% for the week, it wasn’t entirely terrible.

It certainly could have been much, much worse, especially as oil was hit so hard to end the week, as well.

Still, the single new position opened on the week fared well and there were a couple of ex-dividend positions, as well as an assignment.

It also helped to see one uncovered position get some cover, although another position did end up ex[piring.

This week just showed how terrible investors, pollsters and everyone else happens to be.

The confidence exhibited by investors heading into the “Brexit” vote has to be way up there with the biggest mis-reads in the world.

Amazingly markets were driven higher on Thursday ahead of the vote as if there was immunity to disappointment.

That was definitely not the case as everyone get it so terribly wrong.

Politicians, pollsters, bookies and investors.

We will start the week with what look to be lots of bargains.

I will start the week with a little more cash from an assignment, but with about 5 ex-dividend positions on the week I may not feel much uregency to add any new positions.

The manner in which financials were hit to end the week, however, makes them very tempting, but those temptations may abound in other sectors, as well.

Why Macy’s had to feel the blow from Brexit, I may not fully comprehend, but there may be good reason to look critically at lots of things.

For now, though, I’m just going to think about the weekend and how good it is to be in the United States of America, without too much thought of any important state deciding to secede.


This week’s details may be seen in the Weekly Performance spreadsheet * or in the PDF file, as well as in the summary below

(Note: Duplicate mention of positions reflects different priced lots):



New Positions Opened:  CY

Puts Closed in order to take profits:  none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the next weekly cycle: none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into extended weekly cycle:  none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the monthly cycle: none

Calls Rolled Over, taking profits, into a future monthly cycle:  none

Calls Rolled Up, taking net profits into same cyclenone

New STO: STX

Put contracts expired: none

Put contracts rolled over: none

Long term call contracts sold:  none

Calls Assigned:  MRO

Calls Expired:  HFC

Puts Assigned:  none

Stock positions Closed to take profits:  none

Stock positions Closed to take losses: none

Calls Closed to Take Profits: none

Ex-dividend Positions   LVS (6/20 $0.72), JPY (6/20 $0.01)

Ex-dividend Positions Next Week: CY (6/28 $0.11), DOW (6/28 $0.46), EMC (6/29 $0.11), WFM (6/29 $0.14), GPS (7/1 $0.23)

For the coming week the existing positions have lots that still require the sale of contracts:   AGQ, ANF, AZN, BBBY, BBY, CHK, CLF, COH, CSCO,  CY, DOW, FAST, FCX, GDX, GM, GPS, HAL, HFC, HPQ, INTC, IP, JCP, JOY, KMI, KSS, LVS, MCPIQ, MOS, NEM, RIG, WFM, WLTGQ, WY (See “Weekly Performance” spreadsheet or PDF file)



* If you don’t have a program to read or modify spreadsheets, you can download the OpenOffice Suite at no cost.



Week In Review – June 13 – 17, 2016

 

Option to Profit

Week in Review

 

June 13 – 17, 2016

 

NEW POSITIONS/STO NEW STO ROLLOVERS CALLS ASSIGNED/PUTS EXPIRED CALLS EXPIRED/PUTS ASSIGNED CLOSED EX-DIVIDEND
1  /  1 0 3 0   /   0 2   /   0 0 3

 

Weekly Up to Date Performance

June 13 – 17, 2016


Well, I don’t think anyone has any real clue of what happened this week.

I know I don’t, as there was certainly no theme for the week, other than more and more talk about the upcoming vote in Great Britain over continued membership in the European Union.

Last week we were left with nothing but uncertainty over what this week would bring and it only brought more uncertainty..

Somehow, with all of the uncertainty, I found a reason to part with a little bit of money, otherwise it would have been the third week in a row with nothing to really show for it.

Thanks to the strong showing by oil to end the week, that position ended the week 3.2% higher while the adjusted and unadjusted S&P 500 were each 1.2% lower’

Thanks to a very strong premium and the ability to roll the position over, it ended the week 4.4% higher than the S&P 500.

Existing positions were 0.8% higher than the S&P 500 for the week, however, that meant they still lost 0.4%.

With no new assignments on the week closed positions in 2016 were 8.3% higher, while the comparable performance for the S&P 500 during the same holding periods has been 1.7% higher. That represents a 383.6% difference in return on closed positions. That would be much more impressive if there were many more closed positions in 2016, but that just hasn’t been the case.

Even as existing positions lost 0.4% for the week, it wasn’t entirely terrible.

The single new position, which represented the third time that stock had been purchased in the past couple of months fared well.

There was also the opportunity to roll over 3 positions for the week and another 3 were ex-dividend.

That leaves next week, the first of the July 2016 option cycle having 2 expiring positions and another 2 ex-dividend positions, so there is a little less need to generate additional income.

AS in recent weeks, I would probably prefer the opportunity to rollover some of those expiring volatile positions, even if they are in the money. At this point, while I would like to raise some cash, I like the proposition of collecting a respectable dividend and still having a relatively large cushion in the event those shares do decline.

That was the situation on Monday, when I decided to roll the dice with the one of the 3 lots of the Gold Miners ETF i hold.

I thought about cashing in and perhaps either storing the cash or diversifying, but that combination of premium and cushion was just too enticing .

Next week, with just a little bit of cash, I’m still interested in opening some new positions, even as I may already have sufficient income opportunities.

All eyes are going to be focused on England as no one can agree where the vote will go, no what the impact of either direction would really be.

My guess is that the market would react negatively if England voted to leave and that would likely represent a buying opportunity once investors realize that nothing is going to change over night and there’s lots of reasons for both side of the English Channel to continue meaningful business and financial relationships.

Beyond that we may be back to oil and its big bounces, as we saw this week, but what we didn’t necessarily see was high concordance between stocks and oil.

Some days stocks followed the changes in oil very closely, including the intra-day changes and on other days the two completely ignored one another as other events, such as European Markets and FOMC news may have taken precedence.

Even as we look toward the mid-week vote, I think we may see as much confusion over where to go as we’ve seen the past 2 weeks.

For my part, as long as that drives up volatility and net asset value doesn’t suffer too much, I welcome any chance to get some premiums out of the action.

This past week did bring some uncovered positions closer to being able to get some cover as their premiums started rising.

Hopefully next week will continue that trend, as it’s hard to see any other trend developing

This week’s details may be seen in the Weekly Performance spreadsheet * or in the PDF file, as well as in the summary below

(Note: Duplicate mention of positions reflects different priced lots):



New Positions Opened:  MRO

Puts Closed in order to take profits:  none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the next weekly cycle: MRO

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into extended weekly cycle:  GDX (7/22)

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the monthly cycle: none

Calls Rolled Over, taking profits, into a future monthly cycle:  DOW

Calls Rolled Up, taking net profits into same cyclenone

New STO: none

Put contracts expired: none

Put contracts rolled over: none

Long term call contracts sold:  none

Calls Assigned:  none

Calls Expired:  HPQ, UAL

Puts Assigned:  none

Stock positions Closed to take profits:  none

Stock positions Closed to take losses: none

Calls Closed to Take Profits: none

Ex-dividend Positions   HPQ (6/6 $0.12), M (6/13 ^0.38), BBBY (6/15 $0.125)

Ex-dividend Positions Next Week: LVS (6/20 $0.72), JPY (6/20 $0.01)

For the coming week the existing positions have lots that still require the sale of contracts:   AGQ, ANF, AZN, BBBY, BBY, CHK, CLF, COH, CSCO,  CY, DOW, FAST, FCX, GDX, GM, GPS, HAL, HFC, HPQ, INTC, IP, JCP, JOY, KMI, KSS, LVS, MCPIQ, MOS, NEM, RIG, WFM, WLTGQ, WY (See “Weekly Performance” spreadsheet or PDF file)



* If you don’t have a program to read or modify spreadsheets, you can download the OpenOffice Suite at no cost.



Week in Review – June 6 – 10, 2016

 

Option to Profit

Week in Review

 

June 6 – 10, 2016

 

NEW POSITIONS/STO NEW STO ROLLOVERS CALLS ASSIGNED/PUTS EXPIRED CALLS EXPIRED/PUTS ASSIGNED CLOSED EX-DIVIDEND
0  /  0 0 1 0   /   0 0   /   0 0 5

 

Weekly Up to Date Performance

June 6 – 10, 2016


Well, that was a bad end to a week that started out so promisingly for no real reason at all.

After last  Friday’s Employment Situation Report and this past Monday’s comments from Janet Yellen, the market had no reason to think anything at all.

What we were left with this week was just more uncertainty about what comes next.

Anyway, this was another week that I was also too unsure about much of anything and once again made no new opening position trades.

This was also another week of market mediocrity, although the numbers were looking pretty good heading into the closing session for the week.

The S&P 500 ended the week finishing 0.1% lower on both an unadjusted and adjusted basis. That’s after having finished last week unchanged.

But still, just as in the previous week, there was a little good news as there was one rollover, although there were no assignments.

There were also 5 ex-dividend positions to make things a little bit easier to take.

The good news ended there, as opposed to last week when existing positions ended the week 1.8% higher than the S&P 500, this week they trailed by 0.2%

With no new assignments on the week closed positions in 2016 were 8.3% higher, while the comparable performance for the S&P 500 during the same holding periods has been 1.7% higher. That represents a 383.6% difference in return on closed positions. That would be much more impressive if there were many more closed positions in 2016, but that just hasn’t been the case.

Maybe next week as the June 2016 option cycle comes to its end.

The market ended up the week poorly as most focus will be on the FOMC next week.

The market deteriorated after it likely realized that whatever was interpreted as being good news from Janet Yellen, wasn’t really any news at all.

Fortunately, there were plenty of ex-dividend positions this week, just as in the previous week and a handful more next week.

With no one expecting any action from the FOMC there may still be reason for some large movements.

That may all depend on the wording of their statement when it is released on Wednesday afternoon.

I do have some money to spend, but once again, I’m not too anxious to do so.

With a few positions set to expire and a couple of ex-dividend positions, there may be enough to keep me happy, but I would still like to see some reason to spend some of the money sitting in the cash pile, as small as it is.

Once we get past the FOMC Statement release and now that earnings are essentially done, we may get back to oil ruling the markets, just as they did to end this week.

It has been a couple of weeks since oil took center stage, but there may not be too much competition for it doing so after Wednesday’s announcement.


.

This week’s details may be seen in the Weekly Performance spreadsheet * or in the PDF file, as well as in the summary below

(Note: Duplicate mention of positions reflects different priced lots):



New Positions Opened:  none

Puts Closed in order to take profits:  none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the next weekly cycle: none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into extended weekly cycle:  HFC (6/24)

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the monthly cycle: none

Calls Rolled Over, taking profits, into a future monthly cycle:  none

Calls Rolled Up, taking net profits into same cyclenone

New STO: none

Put contracts expired: none

Put contracts rolled over: none

Long term call contracts sold:  none

Calls Assigned:  none

Calls Expired:  none

Puts Assigned:  none

Stock positions Closed to take profits:  none

Stock positions Closed to take losses: none

Calls Closed to Take Profits: none

Ex-dividend Positions  BBY (6/10 $0.28), ,KSS (6/6 $0.50), NEM (6/7 $0.025), GM (6/8 $0.38), WY (6/8 $0.31)

Ex-dividend Positions Next Week:  HPQ (6/6 $0.12), BBBY (6/15 $0.125)

For the coming week the existing positions have lots that still require the sale of contracts:   AGQ, ANF, AZN, BBBY, BBY, CHK, CLF, COH, CSCO,  CY, DOW, FAST, FCX, GDX, GM, GPS, HAL, HFC, HPQ, INTC, IP, JCP, JOY, KMI, KSS, LVS, MCPIQ, MOS, NEM, RIG, WFM, WLTGQ, WY (See “Weekly Performance” spreadsheet or PDF file)



* If you don’t have a program to read or modify spreadsheets, you can download the OpenOffice Suite at no cost.